All-on-4 vs All-on-6: Clinical Differences
Back to Blog
Treatment Options

All-on-4 vs All-on-6: Clinical Differences

January 15, 2026Fusion Dental Implants
All-on-4All-on-6full arch implantsdental implantstreatment comparisonSacramento

All-on-4 vs All-on-6: Clinical Differences That Matter

All-on-4 and All-on-6 are full-arch implant strategies designed to restore an entire dental arch with a fixed prosthesis.

They are not interchangeable. The difference is not marketing—it is biomechanics.

Implant Number and Load Distribution

The primary difference is the number of implants supporting the prosthesis.

  • All-on-4 uses four implants
  • All-on-6 uses six implants

More implants generally reduce force per implant, increasing redundancy and safety margins.

Bone Requirements

All-on-4 relies heavily on:

  • Anterior bone availability
  • Posterior implant angulation

All-on-6 typically requires:

  • More bone volume
  • Less angulation
  • More uniform distribution

Patients with borderline bone conditions may benefit from additional implants.

Immediate Loading Considerations

Both systems may support immediate loading, but:

  • All-on-4 demands higher precision
  • All-on-6 offers greater forgiveness

Immediate load failures often result from underestimating force and stability requirements.

Prosthetic Design Implications

With fewer implants:

  • Cantilevers are often longer
  • Prosthetic stress increases

All-on-6 allows:

  • Shorter cantilevers
  • Improved occlusal balance
  • Reduced mechanical complications

Surgical Complexity vs Long-Term Risk

All-on-4:

  • Less invasive
  • Shorter surgery
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Higher sensitivity to error

All-on-6:

  • More invasive
  • Higher initial cost
  • Greater long-term stability margin

The choice should be clinical, not financial.

Failure Management

When an implant fails:

  • All-on-4 systems lose 25% of support
  • All-on-6 systems lose ~17% of support

Redundancy matters when complications occur.

Choosing the Right Approach

The correct approach depends on:

  • Bone anatomy
  • Bite forces
  • Patient risk profile
  • Maintenance capability

There is no universally superior option. There is only appropriate planning.

Expert Evaluation in Northern California

At Fusion Dental Implants, our specialists evaluate each case individually using 3D imaging and biomechanical analysis. We recommend the approach that offers the best long-term outcome for your specific situation.

View our pricing options

Schedule your free consultation


About Fusion Dental Implants: Full-arch implant specialists serving Sacramento, Roseville, and the Bay Area.

Ready to Transform Your Smile?

Schedule your free consultation today and discover how dental implants can change your life.